In general, these considerations have an impact on the Treaty provisions on the case of force majeure. Contracts for the sale of LNG also, as a rule, include obligations related to the force majeure event that the parties wish to keep in mind. This may include:6 Sometimes corrective clauses involve ending the delay due to force majeure. For example, due to force majeure, a construction contract may allow for a separation of up to 30 days. So far, the outbreak of the coronavirus has had a huge impact on the global economy and the LNG industry is no exception. One of the issues that came to the fore, both among sellers and buyers of LNG, was the availability of force majeure relief. However, the inclusion of a force majeure clause does not guarantee the success of a buyer`s confidence in it. The buyer must prove that COVID-19 complies with the language of the SPG clause. Buyers may be required to demonstrate that performance was impossible, that COVID-19 and its consequences were not foreseeable at the time of entering into the parties` contract, and that the buyer could not have taken steps to avoid or minimize the consequences. The ability of a buyer to terminate the GSP therefore depends on the language of the clause and the facts. In the context of the significant COVID-19 outbreak, parties may consider invoking such common law principles to apologize for their performance in their agreements.
However, it must be recognized that, in most jurisdictions, “the doctrines of commercial inequity and servitude must be applied sparingly” and that, in order to modify economic circumstances to justify non-compliance, a party must demonstrate that the modification goes beyond the normal range of expected circumstances. See thorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc., 534 A.2d 798, 586 (Pa. That`s great. Ct. 1987). However, in certain circumstances, a dramatic change in building revenues resulting from COVID-19-related closures or state-ordered closures may be a sufficient justification under these common rules. However, as noted above, even if the argument is clear, the parties are well advised to provide substantial notification and to take all available measures to mitigate the impact of their decisions on their counterparties.
Experience has shown that such measures can reduce the likelihood of litigation and improve the party`s chances of success if it has to defend its decision before a judge or jury. Therefore, the following should be addressed in a force majeure clause: countries around the world starting to respond aggressively to the COVID-19 virus, governments have called for social distancing, the closure of some retail businesses, restaurants and other stores, as well as eviction moratoriums. Capital markets have been in turmoil for weeks. For real estate and other customers who have entered into contracts for the purchase and sale of real estate and obligations to finance such transactions, as well as leases, construction contracts and property management contracts, the uncertainty created by this COVID-19 response has raised critical questions about the continuation of the planned operations and how to proceed. Clients review agreements to determine if there are conditions of conclusion, essential adverse event (EAF) provisions or force majeure provisions that could justify a decision not to proceed with a transaction. These types of provisions are found in all types of documents related to real estate, including credit commitments, leases, property management contracts, construction contracts, development contracts and, in some cases, purchase and sale contracts. . . .
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.