Sweet Potato Apple Casserole

I love Halloween. A few weeks ago, as I cruised a nearby Ben Franklin for Halloween decorations, I stumbled upon an excellent little magazine of Halloween recipes, ideas, costume patterns, etc. Inside was a recipe for sweet potato apple casserole, and my goodness, every bite tastes like autumn.

Software

3 pounds sweet potatoes

4 medium or 3 large tart apples, peeled

¼ cup lemon juice

½ cup chopped pecans or walnuts

½ cup (1 stick) butter, cubed

½ cup packed brown sugar

½ cup honey

2 tablespoons orange juice

½ teaspoons ground cinnamon

¼ teaspoons ground ginger

Hardware

11″x7″ baking dish

Large bowl

Small saucepan

Baking sheet

Preheat the oven to 400° F.

Scrub the sweet potatoes with a vegetable brush under cold water, then poke each potato in several places with a fork and place them on a baking sheet.

[IMAGE]

Bake at 400° for 35-45 minutes, or until almost tender (they should give just slightly when squeezed). Cool slightly, then peel and slice into 1/4-inch slices.

Cut the peeled apples into 1/4-inch slices and toss with lemon juice in the large bowl. In a greased 11″x7″ baking dish, arrange sweet potato and apple slices alternately. Sprinkle with nuts.

[IMAGE]

In the small saucepan, combine the remaining ingredients over medium heat (50%). Bring to a boil, stirring frequently. Remove from the heat and pour the mixture over the potatoes and apples.

[IMAGE]

Bake, uncovered, at 400° for 25 to 30 minutes, until tender.

[IMAGE]

Absolutely delicious.

Writing It Down

[IMAGE]

If you don’t write things down, you’ll forget them.

We all know this. We’ve been told this by our parents. We have an idea or we suggest some improvement, and someone says, “You’d better write that down or you’ll forget it.”

But most people don’t do it. They nod, and laugh, and they go on to another topic of conversation. And the idea dissipates. Gone.

Why don’t people write down their ideas? Why don’t we record all our neat ideas? Why don’t we dump them in a box and sort through them occasionally, and try out a few of them?

(I certainly do; I even keep index cards and a pencil in my left-hand pants pocket at all times, just in case an idea comes to me. Once I fill up a card, I drop it into my inbox for later processing. I mean, why not?)

Jonathan Coulton

[IMAGE]

Last week I blogged about Geoff Smith, a “geek musician.” Today, I’m going to blog about arguably the biggest geek musician, Jonathan Coulton.

He’s undoubtedly best known for composing the end credits song for the game Portal, “Still Alive,” though he also wrote the programmer anthem “Code Monkey.” They’re both great little songs.

He’s written much more music than that. In fact, he’s written dozens and dozens of songs, thanks to a friend suggesting that he write a song a week. So he did.

Whereas Geoff Smith has a Beatles vibe, Coulton’s a bit more like They Might Be Giants. His songs are quirky, but usually have a neat twist or emotional theme despite the odd theme.

For example, “Skullcrusher Mountain” is a love song, sung by an evil mastermind to the girl he’s kidnapped. There’s an odd, desperate sadness to it. “Code Monkey” is about a programmer’s love for a co-worker, which he can’t quite bring himself to do anything about. “Flickr” is composed entirely of photo titles from Flickr, and after a while does give you a feel for the breathtaking number of hobbies and interests out there.

Best of all, he offers all his music as standard MP3 downloads off his site, for $1 each ($10 per album). You can also listen to previews of each, and he offers a rotating set of his songs free.

The songs are fun and poignant. Worth a try.

Tame multiple mailboxes with OpenInbox

[IMAGE]

One problem with modern websites: the dependence on email. Every site wants your email address, and send you email to verify your account, and email you occasional notices.

But some of these sites give out your address to other, less…useful sites. Moreover, it’s hard to keep track of all those emails.

Enter OpenInbox. When you sign up, you get your own subdomain, (your name).openinbox.com. So, I snagged brentnewhall.openinbox.com. The website gives you web-based email. Any email sent to any address at (your name).openinbox.com will show up in your OpenInbox inbox. Moreover, all your email will be listed and sorted by the address.

So, when I register at a new website, I can make up an email address just for it: kagami@brentnewhall.openinbox.com. The next one might be nagato@brentnewhall.openinbox.com. My inbox at OpenInbox will show all the emails to all these addresses, listed under “kagami” or “nagato”.

Instant organization, and easy tracking of which sites use which email. A lovely solution. And it’s free.

My Website Design Portfolio

[IMAGE]

As I’ve been trying to set up my freelancing business, I’ve had a difficult time getting work. And much of that revolved around my experience.

After going through all the sites I’ve worked on, I realized that I only finished a few sites. And several of those were internal company sites that I could no longer access. I couldn’t demonstrate my skills.

So, I designed and built a few sample sites. They don’t do anything; they just showcase some of my skills.

I then assembled a portfolio of my website designs, which I host on this site. I can now direct potential clients there, to show them what I can do.

And business immediately spiked. Whew!

Scam from Golden Living (formerly Beverly Enterprises)?

[IMAGE]

Please note the comments on this post. I may very well have been wrong on this one.

Today, I received a letter from “Golden Living (formerly Beverly Enterprises).” This company runs nursing homes and assisted living facilities. I twas originally sent to a “Mary Newhall” near me (and I’m from a small family with no nearby relatives named “Newhall”), but was redirected to me. It reads:

DEAR FRIEND:

OUR RECORDS INDICATE THAT YOU ARE THE OWNER OF THE FUNDS

REPRESENTED BY THE ITEM LISTED BELOW. NO TRANSACTION OR

ACTIVITY HAS BEEN NOTED FOR A SIGNIFICANT TIME. IF YOU

HAVE AN INTEREST IN THESE FUNDS AND WISH TO PREVENT SUCH

FUNDS FROM BEING REPORTED TO THE STATE, PLEASE COMPLETE

THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES:

  • PROVIDE YOUR CURRENT ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NUMBER AND

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

  • OR TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IF YOU ARE A BUSINESS
  • SIGN AND RETURN THIS INFORMATION PROMPTLY TO THE

ADDRESS BELOW FOR PAYMENT

  • IF PERSON RETURNING FORM IS NOT THE ADDRESSEE, PLEASE

ENCLOSE A COPY OF THE WILL OR POWER OF ATTORNEY TO

SHOW THAT THESE FUNDS ARE RIGHTFULLY YOURS.

GOLDEN LIVING (FORMERLY BEVERLY ENTERPRISES)

1000 FIANNA WAY

FORT SMITH, AR 72919–4118

ATTN: T. J. STIGA

This is followed by fill-in fields for signature, SSN/tax ID, address, and phone number. Certainly smells like a scam.

What’s interesting is that the company itself is certainly legitimate, and the included address is indeed the registered address of the business’s headquarters (according to Forbes). It looks like one of its employees is running a scam through their headquarters.

The letter includes no other contact information (e.g., phone number) for this “T.J. Stiga,” which certainly arouses my suspicions, besides the fact that disbursing funds like this should involve much more rigorous procedures than just sending a letter saying “give us your SSN and we’ll send you money from this person’s account.”

What’s even more interesting is that a quick Google search reveals a T.J. Stiga living at 2100 S V St, Fort Smith, AR, with a home phone number of 479-782-8576, as well as a Facebook page. I’m tempted to call him up.

Anyway, if you see a letter like this from “Golden Living,” beware.

Geoff Smith, Geek Musician

I first heard of Geoff Smith on TWiT Live, through his fan song I’m a Twit. It was a fun homage to the show, so I checked out his music.

The man’s composed quite a few tech-oriented songs, and he has the distinct advantage of being both a good singer and a good songwriter. His songs are catchy, entertaining, light, and easy to listen to.

And most of his songs have a tech angle, from the anti-RIAA song “Set the music free” to his commentary on vicious online commentary, “Ones and 0s.”

Great stuff.

Houses of the Blooded

[IMAGE]

Saalon and I have talked before about the future of tabletop roleplaying. It started with the fantasy hack-and-slash of Dungeons & Dragons in the 1970’s, followed by the introduction of generic systems like GURPS and FUDGE in the 1980’s (allowing for modern games, science fiction games, etc.), and the explosion of more open and acting-driven systems with White Wolf’s World of Darkness in the 1990’s.

What’s next? I think I may have found it.

I spent much of the weekend devouring a 400-page PDF for Houses of the Blooded, a new tabletop RPG system.

Very roughly, it’s World of Darkness in the Dune universe. It’s focused on helping you to play a role more than kill goblins.

In particular, players can temporarily take over as referee.

As with many tabletop games, whenever you attempt something tough and outside your character’s normal abilities, you roll dice. But the dice don’t determine whether you succeed; if you roll high enough, you as the player get to decide if you succeed or fail. If you don’t roll high enough, the Narrator (Game Master/referee) decides if you succeed or fail.

So, no matter what you roll, you may still succeed. But there’s more to it than even that. You roll a number of dice at a time, which may be more dice than you need. You can reserve any number of dice as your “wager,” and roll the rest. If you roll high enough, not only do you succeed, you get to add one fact to the success for every die you reserved in your wager. So, if you’re leaping out of a bedroom, and you wagered three dice, you might say “Yes, I succeeded. And there’s a balcony outside, and I land on it, and it goes all the way along the building.” Three facts added for the three dice wagered.

This is revolutionary. It provides a simple way for players to control the progress of the game. They’re not inventing super-powerful weapons out of thin air; they’re influencing the game to make it more fun.

Can it be abused? Well, anything can be abused, but the system makes it clear that 1) each fact must agree with the story so far, and 2) if you try to add a fact that helps you and hurts the other players, you’re not welcome in the game. Simple as that.

It’s hard to describe why I find this so exciting. It just feels right to me, and it feels like something that will help the roleplaying industry move forward.

True Narcissism vs. Reality

[IMAGE]

‘Twas talking with my Mom this weekend about a friend of ours; we’ll call her “Betty.” Betty has issues with certain members of her family, who are making some very difficult decisions that go against the grain of Betty’s upbringing.

These family members are doing what’s best for them—what will keep them safe and sane and healthy. But it goes against Betty’s world view.

My Mom expressed frustration with Betty, as Betty just would not see their point of view. Had no sympathy for them.

Betty’s also a narcissist. Now, that word’s bandied about a lot without a solid understanding of its meaning: clinical narcissism means “denial of the true self.” A clinical narcissist is so worried about protecting herself that she creates a wall so thick that nothing can get through. She presents a false front to everyone. It’s so thick that even she can’t get through to see her true self.

So it is with Betty.

I explained to Mom that Betty doesn’t want to break down her wall. She can’t, unless she wants to break out of her narcissism. As long as that wall is up, she’s “safe,” but she literally will have no sympathy for anyone who doesn’t follow her own worldview. She can’t imagine it; can barely even contemplate it.

Worse, as long as that wall is up, Betty can’t acknowledge being wrong. Her worldview is the only thing that can exist, so by definition there are no other possibilities. She can’t acknowledge the existence of anything outside her own worldview.

And so, my Mom understood. I wonder if Betty ever will.

Dead Poet’s Society

[IMAGE]

So I watched Dead Poet’s Society a couple of months ago. I’d heard it was good, but never really got around to it.

It knocked my socks off.

First off, it’s beautiful. The cinematographer goes to great lengths to capture the beauty of prep school grounds in New England. From the fiery colors of the forest in autumn to a heavy winter snowfall, the movie just looks gorgeous.

Secondly, it’s not about Robin Williams. In fact, he’s only in a few scenes, and in them he plays a quiet, bookish, somewhat eccentric literature professor. Nothing wild about him at all.

Third, it’s about growing up. It’s about a bunch of boys who realize the need to carpe diem. Who realize that just doing what they’re supposed to do isn’t enough.

And the film’s infused with great poetry. Classic poetry. Poetry to make one feel like the top of one’s head had been taken off, to use Emily Dickinson’s phrase.

It’s a grand film.

I work for Amazon. The content on this site is my own and doesn’t necessarily represent Amazon’s position.